Ancient and Modern: Floki and Okonkwo as Tragic Heroes in Global Texts

Abstract

This article offers a comparative postcolonial analysis of two iconic figures from distinct
geo-cultural and media traditions: Okonkwo, from Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart
(1958), and Floki, from the historical drama Vikings (2013).

Through a critical engagement with the trope of the tragic hero, this study interrogates the cultural, religious, and
existential ruptures embodied in their resistance to civilizational flux. Drawing on theoretical insights from postcolonial literary criticism, world cinema, and mythological studies, this paper elucidates how both figures reflect a shared pathos of cultural decline,
metaphysical disenchantment, and existential alienation in the face of transcultural modernity.

Introduction: The Tragic Imperative of Cultural Guardianship

In the pantheon of global tragic figures, few parallel the symbolic gravitas of Okonkwo and Floki. Though originating from disparate traditions the Igbo cosmological imagination and the Nordic mythopoetic matrix, respectively both characters are bound
by an archaism that renders them incompatible with modernity. Okonkwo, a central figure in Chinua Achebe’s anti-colonial literary canon, epitomizes the Igbo patriarchal archetype whose identity is entangled with an inflexible interpretation of cultural orthodoxy (Achebe,
1958; Gikandi, 2001). For Okonkwo, masculinity, honor, and tradition become inseparable pillars of identity. His father’s failure becomes a generational trauma, compelling him to overcompensate by becoming hyper-masculine and violently traditional.

Conversely, Floki, the master shipwright and religious zealot in Vikings, functions as a conduit for Old Norse religiosity and anti-Christian resentment, embodying the tension between cultural purity and imperial contamination (Hirst, 2013; Jakobsson, 2017). His resistance to foreign cultural encroachment is portrayed through an intense religiosity and xenophobic hostility to Christianity, which he views as a direct threat to the mythic coherence and metaphysical integrity of Norse cosmology.

Both characters are ontologically yoked to the dying embers of their respective civilizations. In postcolonial criticism, such figures occupy a liminal space wherein tradition collapses under the weight of imperial imposition (Bhabha, 1994; Fanon, 1963). Okonkwo’s narrative is paradigmatic of cultural stasis confronted by colonial modernity; his tragic arc unfolds as a refusal to accept hybridity as a necessary survival modality. His suicide, a violation of both communal and spiritual codes, underscores a terminal cultural rupture what Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o might interpret as “cultural castration” (Ngũgĩ, 1986). He is not merely an individual who fails; he becomes emblematic of a broader communal unpreparedness to grapple with systemic epistemological shifts ushered in by colonial forces.

Floki, similarly, constructs his identity around religious zeal and cultural insularity. His disdain for Christianity, personified in his murder of Athelstan, is not merely theological but ideological: it is a repudiation of transculturation. As Hall (1990) asserts, identity is always in a process of becoming. Floki’s inability to negotiate this becoming renders him obsolete—a tragic relic of a mythicized past. His alienation is dramatized through a slow descent into madness, exile, and existential despair. His journey to Iceland and subsequent disappointment in finding Christian influence even in the seemingly untouched wilds reflect the inexorability of cultural diffusion and the futility of isolationist purism.

Myth, Ritual, and the Ethos of Resistance

Mythologically, both figures are steeped in ritual and sacral duty. Okonkwo’s participation in the killing of Ikemefuna (Achebe, 1958, p. 61) reflects a sacrificial logic intended to uphold communal cosmology, albeit at the cost of personal anguish. Though religiously justified, his choice signifies the conflict between communal expectation and individual morality. His later attempts to galvanize a war against the colonial administration further position him as a self-appointed guardian of an endangered cultural order. His tragic flaw lies in his interpretive rigidity and failure to apprehend that resistance must be tactical and strategic, not simply valorous.

Likewise, Floki is a mythopoetic figure, animated by visions, omens, and divine mandates. He often claims to receive guidance directly from the gods, constructing his actions as divinely ordained rather than morally contingent. His spiritual odyssey into the caves of Iceland mirrors the archetypal descent into the underworld—a katabasis that reveals not divine continuity but ideological extinction. The symbolism of the volcanic eruption that seemingly buries him, combined with the discovery of the Christian cross, offers a dual allegory: the catastrophic end of a worldview and the triumph of a new religious order. His vision quest ends in a tragic inversion of spiritual expectation, finding not the divine but the void.

The Failure to Embrace Cultural Hybridity

Both characters tragically ignore the dynamism of cultural syncretism. Obierika and Ragnar Lothbrok operate as foils to Okonkwo and Floki, demonstrating adaptive capacities to navigate interstitial spaces between cultural systems. Obierika, for instance, functions as
the moral and philosophical counterpoint to Okonkwo’s fanaticism. He embodies the cautious observer of cultural erosion who believes in questioning the old ways while seeking to understand the new. He articulates the tension between traditional loyalty and
emergent modernity.

While complex, Ragnar’s friendship with Athelstan affirms Hall’s (1996) notion of identity as contingent, constructed, and plural. Ragnar is both Norse and cosmopolitan, driven by curiosity rather than fear. His vision for a multicultural Kattegat where various beliefs can coexist anticipates a modern post-secular polity. Floki, in contrast, is blinded by the illusion of cultural permanence, failing to see that culture itself is a site of negotiation, contestation, and transformation.

Floki’s ideological inflexibility and Okonkwo’s moral absolutism preclude them from participating in the transformative historical moment that defines their epoch. Their respective punishments—exile, social alienation, and death—reiterate what Gilroy (1993) terms “the melancholia of postcolonial subjectivity,” where the inability to negotiate diasporic dislocations results in psychic disintegration. Their decline illustrates a failure to transition from cultural guardianship to cultural adaptation.

Conclusion: Tragedy and the Dialectics of Cultural Loss

Ultimately, Okonkwo and Floki are tragic not simply because they die, but because they are epistemologically exhausted. They represent the vestiges of worlds that can no longer exist within the coordinates of modernity. Their resistance is noble but futile, poetic but
myopic. In dramatizing their demise, Things Fall Apart and Vikings produce a transhistorical discourse on the limits of cultural preservation amidst global imperial and epistemic violence. They are tragic not because they fought for lost causes, but because they misunderstood the nature of change. As custodians of tradition who collapse under the weight of history, they evoke catharsis not merely in their downfall, but in their tragic inability to become something else. Their stories serve as cautionary tales of cultural atrophy in the age of syncretic evolution.

Works Cited

Achebe, Chinua. Things Fall Apart. Heinemann, 1958.
Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. Routledge, 1994.
Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Constance Farrington, Grove Press, 1963.
Gilroy, Paul. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Harvard UP, 1993.
Gikandi, Simon. Reading Chinua Achebe: Language and Ideology in Fiction. James Currey, 2001.
Hall, Stuart. “Cultural Identity and Diaspora.” Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, Lawrence & Wishart, 1990, pp. 222–37.
Hall, Stuart. Questions of Cultural Identity*. Edited by Stuart Hall and Paul du Gay, SAGE, 1996.
Hirst, Michael, creator. Vikings. History Channel / Netflix, 2013–2020.
Jakobsson, Ármann. “Vikings and the Imagination: The Norse Myth in Popular Culture.” Scandinavian Studies, vol. 89, no. 2, 2017, pp. 203–26.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Structural Anthropology. Translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf, Basic Books, 1963.
Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann, 1986.